Civil society organisations have raised strong objections to the current process through which the President appoints the Chairman and National Commissioners of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), citing concerns over transparency and potential conflicts of interest.
In a memorandum submitted to both chambers of the National Assembly, the activists called for an urgent review of the appointment process. They argue that allowing the sitting President to appoint the electoral umpire undermines the independence and credibility of INEC.
The call was made during the presentation of a policy brief and memorandum in Abuja, organised by the Women Rights Advancement and Protection Alternative (WRAPA) in collaboration with the African Centre for Leadership, Strategy and Development (Centre LSD).
Speaking at the event, Dr. Austin Aigbe emphasised the need for a more transparent and politically neutral process for selecting INEC leadership. He warned that the current system leaves room for undue influence, potentially compromising electoral integrity.
The memorandum, titled “Appointment Criteria for INEC Chairman and Commissioners”, recommends the creation of an independent panel made up of representatives from eight different institutions. This panel would screen candidates and nominate three individuals, from which the President and National Assembly would jointly select one.
The activists further proposed the establishment of a permanent, independent selection body to oversee the nomination of INEC officials. This, they believe, would promote public confidence, transparency, and fairness in the nation’s electoral system.
